<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Commission&#8217;s green paper on open internet and net neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-830</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-830</guid>
		<description>Of course it might. The actual work for me would be to set the questions in context, gather additional explanations for terms and stuff. (Beyond those in the official document.)

Although a simple contact form should do the trick as well. As I said I&#039;ll be doing it in German however, probably earliest on the weekend. But you&#039;re more than welcome to pick up on that idea.

More input won&#039;t hurt the Commission, I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it might. The actual work for me would be to set the questions in context, gather additional explanations for terms and stuff. (Beyond those in the official document.)</p>
<p>Although a simple contact form should do the trick as well. As I said I&#8217;ll be doing it in German however, probably earliest on the weekend. But you&#8217;re more than welcome to pick up on that idea.</p>
<p>More input won&#8217;t hurt the Commission, I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurogoblin</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurogoblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-824</guid>
		<description>What is the next step in terms of setting up an online form? Maybe a Wordpress plugin might work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the next step in terms of setting up an online form? Maybe a WordPress plugin might work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-804</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Lino. Great comment. And a brave move on your side, I must say. I actually haven&#039;t thought that lobbyist are that stubborn when it comes to forms. It&#039;s probably too transparent and doesn&#039;t leave much room for imagination on the reader&#039;s side. ;)

I admit however that I do think it could be a problem if the questionnaire gets analysed by different people, or even a machine. But who would it do harm? The reputation of the organisation submitting the form or the actual content being submitted? If you answer to a public consultation it should be the issue which is in the middle of interest. Not the author. I understand of course that I&#039;m being very naive here. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Lino. Great comment. And a brave move on your side, I must say. I actually haven&#8217;t thought that lobbyist are that stubborn when it comes to forms. It&#8217;s probably too transparent and doesn&#8217;t leave much room for imagination on the reader&#8217;s side. ;)</p>
<p>I admit however that I do think it could be a problem if the questionnaire gets analysed by different people, or even a machine. But who would it do harm? The reputation of the organisation submitting the form or the actual content being submitted? If you answer to a public consultation it should be the issue which is in the middle of interest. Not the author. I understand of course that I&#8217;m being very naive here. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-803</guid>
		<description>Exactly my idea, Eurogoblin. Thanks for your comment.

I have in fact started to do so. But I was lazy enough to do it on surveymonkey.com where they only granted me 10 free questions. Not really sufficient here. :-)

But I was really reluctant to send them directly to the Commission official, I&#039;d have collected them first.

However what I will continue to do, is to set up such a form in the German language as I&#039;ve yet to find an official translation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my idea, Eurogoblin. Thanks for your comment.</p>
<p>I have in fact started to do so. But I was lazy enough to do it on surveymonkey.com where they only granted me 10 free questions. Not really sufficient here. :-)</p>
<p>But I was really reluctant to send them directly to the Commission official, I&#8217;d have collected them first.</p>
<p>However what I will continue to do, is to set up such a form in the German language as I&#8217;ve yet to find an official translation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lino</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>Lino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Great post Martin. As an industry lobbyist, I will just comment on the format issue, ie why did the Commission not do an online form/questionnaire format (as they often do using the &quot;Your voice&quot; webpages)? Well probably because most lobbyist really dislike it! And have said so in the past. Even when they do put iup such a form, I think more than half of the lobbyists I know send in a position paper as awhole. Why? Because we lack discipline in answering teh questions in a linear manner, because we dislike boxes, because often when the submission comes from an association, it will take the form of a statement rather than a question-by-question response, etc. I personnally dislike the idea that answers to questions get analysed by different officials, ie John looks at all the answers to question 1 and Bob does the same for 2, etc as I think that often creates distorted views on complex questions.
To end however: pls encourage people to respond. This issue is one that could profoundly affect the Internet as we know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Martin. As an industry lobbyist, I will just comment on the format issue, ie why did the Commission not do an online form/questionnaire format (as they often do using the &#8220;Your voice&#8221; webpages)? Well probably because most lobbyist really dislike it! And have said so in the past. Even when they do put iup such a form, I think more than half of the lobbyists I know send in a position paper as awhole. Why? Because we lack discipline in answering teh questions in a linear manner, because we dislike boxes, because often when the submission comes from an association, it will take the form of a statement rather than a question-by-question response, etc. I personnally dislike the idea that answers to questions get analysed by different officials, ie John looks at all the answers to question 1 and Bob does the same for 2, etc as I think that often creates distorted views on complex questions.<br />
To end however: pls encourage people to respond. This issue is one that could profoundly affect the Internet as we know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eurogoblin</title>
		<link>http://www.europaeum.eu/blog/the-commissions-green-paper-on-open-internet-and-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Eurogoblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.europaeum.eu/?p=1833#comment-797</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t we set up our own form collecting answers to these questions and automatically e-mailing them to the Commission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t we set up our own form collecting answers to these questions and automatically e-mailing them to the Commission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

